Are horizontal split rings considered more effective than vertically split rings according to the author?

The assertion that horizontal split rings are not considered more effective than vertically split rings is supported by various factors related to scope mounting and alignment. Horizontal split rings are designed to hold the scope firmly in place by distributing the pressure evenly across the scope's body without compromising its fit.

Meanwhile, vertically split rings can sometimes introduce alignment issues, especially if not mounted precisely, which can lead to shifts in the point of aim or even create stress on the scope when mounted. The horizontal design promotes better stability and consistency in performance, making it generally more favorable for maintaining zero and ensuring reliable accuracy over time.

By recognizing that the author does not advocate for the superiority of one over the other, you can understand that the effectiveness of split rings is often determined more by the application and individual preference than a strict hierarchy of ring type. This insight helps clarify why horizontal split rings are sometimes viewed as beneficial, but not definitively more effective overall.